On April 19, crypto influencer benmo.eth highlighted the significant repercussions of the KelpDAO rsETH theft, attributing responsibility to both KelpDAO and LayerZero. According to BlockBeats, the incident may lead to several consequences.
Firstly, the security of wrapped assets like LRT is not comparable to native assets, and lending protocols should not treat them as equivalent collateral. Secondly, LayerZero might lose part of its cross-chain market, as several assets, including usde and usd0, have ceased using its cross-chain solutions. Even if operations resume, restoring credibility will be challenging.
Additionally, Aave's reputation for security has been compromised, bringing the risks of unified lending markets under scrutiny. Each new collateral asset introduces additional risks to existing ones, which is unfair to native assets. Aave V4 and modular lending may become future trends, potentially accelerating related transitions. The market will focus more on the lending business itself rather than individual platforms or curators, although this will increase business costs.
Moreover, the cost for Layer 2 to acquire Total Value Locked (TVL) will rise, with some liquidity potentially returning to Layer 1. Lastly, DeFi may halt its expansion and adopt a more conservative security model while addressing AI-driven security threats like Anthropic Mythos.