COPA v. Craig Wright ruling is out, and Wright repeatedly lied to the court

According to BitMEX Research, the COPA (Crypto Open Patent Alliance) case against Craig Wright has now been announced. In the verdict, Craig Wright is far less clever than he thinks he is. In his written testimony and in days of oral testimony during cross-examination, it is completely clear that Wright lied extensively and repeatedly to the court. Most of his lies were related to documents he forged that were intended to support his claims. All of his lies and forged documents were intended to support his biggest lie: his claim that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. The real situation is much simpler. However, because Wright has lied so many times over the years, in some ways it is difficult to pinpoint exactly what actually happened. These difficulties do not affect the fact that Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto. In terms of the evidence that allegedly supports his claims, it is at best questionable or very doubtful, or completely circumstantial, and at worst, it is fabricated and/or based on documents that are believed to be massive forgeries by Wright. These fabrications and forgeries were revealed in the evidence received at trial. As such, this judgment contains a wealth of technical and other details intended to reveal the true scale of his false claims to prove that he is/was Satoshi Nakamoto. These details were laid out in the detailed written closing arguments prepared by COPA and the developers, and further emphasized in their oral closing arguments.