PolkaWorld: Polkadot should not spend money on ineffective advertising and exposure

Polkadot Chinese community PolkaWorld posted on X that PolkaWorld opposed most of the so-called proposals to increase Polkadot's exposure during the first half of the year as a DV. Polkadot does not lack so-called advertising exposure at present, and money should not be spent on advertising exposure without any conversion. Any advertising and exposure should be based on the product, otherwise it is invalid exposure and invalid expenditure. PolkaWorld added that there is an essential problem that has not been solved in the Polkadot ecosystem at present-how to fight against whales? Especially when the intentions of whales are inconsistent with the interests of the entire community, what can the community do... Why can a proposal of millions of dollars without any detailed description, transparent budget and financial report be passed despite the strong opposition of the community? Why does a proposal that applies for tens of thousands of dollars and is very helpful to the community have to be opposed by tens of millions? In the past six months, how many drama proposals have been passed on Polkadot? Currently, what the Polkadot community needs most is: 1. Empower teams that have already built great products, give them liquidity incentives, and attract users to use these great products; 2. Continuously cultivate and discover new teams, new products, and new applications; 3. Only when a user-friendly unicorn application comes out can it attract a large number of users to the Polkadot ecosystem and stay in the Polkadot ecosystem.