Britney Spears blasted from every radio station, The Matrix made us question reality, and teenagers around the world were busy burning CDs to create their own mixtapes. The internet was still clunky, requiring a grating dial-up tone to access, but it was beginning to permeate everyday life. It was the late 1990s. Search engines existed, but they looked and felt cluttered. Yahoo's directory resembled a Yellow Pages, while AltaVista and Lycos spit out long lists of links, fast but disorganized. Finding the information you needed was often a daunting task. Then a white screen appeared, with a clean search box and two buttons—"Google Search" and "I'm Feeling Lucky." People tried it once and never left. That was Google's first "magic trick." The result? Larry Page and Sergey Brin's creation made the word "Google" synonymous with the act of searching. When you forgot a physics theory, you'd say, "Google it!" "Want to learn how to tie the perfect tie? Why not Google it?" Suddenly, searching for facts, finding businesses, and even learning to program became natural. The company then repeated this strategy with Gmail, Android, and its cloud services. Each time, it made the chaotic simple and reliable to the point of being almost boring. In each of the categories it now dominates, Google wasn't the first to enter, but quickly became the leader. Gmail wasn't the first email service, but it offered gigabytes of storage when competitors were still limiting it to megabytes. Android wasn't the first mobile operating system, but it became a mainstay of budget smartphones worldwide. Those who rejected it were, in turn, forgotten by the world. Remember Nokia? The cloud service wasn't the first managed solution, but it offered the reliability that startups and banks were willing to bet on. In each category, Google turned a patchwork of primitive technologies into the default infrastructure. That was the past three decades. Today, Google is doing something contradictory. It is preparing to build on an innovation once envisioned to replace these tech giants: blockchain. With its own native layer blockchain, the tech giant is attempting to replicate in the value world what it has achieved decades ago in the information world. With Google Cloud Universal Ledger, the company hopes to provide financial institutions with an internal layer blockchain that is "efficient, trust-neutral, and supports Python-based smart contracts." Leading global derivatives markets like CME Group are already exploring tokenization and payments using the chain, said Rich Widmann, head of Web3 strategy at Google. Why build an internal blockchain now? Because the money pipeline needs fixing. By 2024, adjusted stablecoin transaction volume is projected to exceed $5 trillion, surpassing PayPal's $1.68 trillion in annual transaction volume and second only to Visa's $13.2 trillion in annual payment volume. However, cross-border payments still take days to settle, cost double-digit percentages, and rely on outdated systems. The Economist notes that if nothing changes, settlement inefficiencies are expected to cost $2.8 trillion annually by 2030. Google wants to start with stablecoins, but its ambitions are even greater. "Stablecoins are just the starting point. The real opportunity lies in tokenizing a wider range of real-world assets and building programmable financial applications on open infrastructure," Google wrote in its blog post. Who will use it? The ledger is permissioned. All participants must pass Know Your Customer (KYC) verification. Smart contracts run in Python, a language already familiar to financial engineers. Access is via an API integrated into Google Cloud's existing services. The industry is skeptical of its "neutral infrastructure" label. When a tech giant that built its empire on centralized data control now claims to offer a "neutral blockchain," I'm not surprised by the skepticism. Besides its scale, what sets Google apart? Wellman believes Google will become the platform on which other financial companies build. "Tether won't use Circle's blockchain, and Adyen probably won't use Stripe's. But any financial institution can work with GCUL." Stripe's Tempo will naturally gravitate towards Stripe merchants. Circle's Arc is built around USDC. Google's selling point was that it had no competing payments or stablecoin businesses, thus offering a credible solution that other companies might adopt. Google wasn't the first in this category either. Other corporate giants had built their own blockchains in the past. Meta (formerly Facebook)'s Libra, later renamed Diem, promised a global stablecoin but never launched. Regulators blocked it, warning it could undermine monetary sovereignty. By January 2022, the project's assets had been sold. R3's Corda and IBM's Hyperledger Fabric established reliable platforms but struggled to scale beyond limited consortiums. These are all permissioned blockchains, valuable to their sponsors, but they failed to steer the industry toward a shared path and ultimately fell into fragmented operations. The lesson is that if everyone believes a single company controls the protocol, the network will fail. This is also a shadow hanging over Google. However, GCUL's first partner, CME Group, offers clues to the direction. If Universal Ledger can handle the daily capital flows of the world's largest derivatives exchanges, its scale will justify wider adoption. This also supports the argument for decentralization. Google Cloud's customers already include banks, fintech companies, and exchanges. For them, connecting to Universal Ledger via APIs may feel like adding another service rather than switching platforms. Google also has the resources to sustain projects abandoned by smaller consortiums due to budget constraints. Therefore, for institutions already embedded in Google's technology stack, adopting GCUL may be smoother than starting over elsewhere. For retail investors, the impact will be more subtle. You won't be logged into the Universal Ledger app, but you'll still feel its presence. Think of refunds that take days to arrive, stuck international transfers, and the delays that have become normalized. If Universal Ledger succeeds, these problems could quietly disappear. You can also expect it to expand into everyday products. Imagine paying a few cents to skip YouTube ads without a monthly YouTube Premium subscription; getting additional Gemini queries for a few cents; or paying for cloud storage with a live stream. The ad-subsidized internet could quietly shift to a pay-per-view model, giving users more choices rather than a single default. For the first time, users may have the opportunity to choose whether to exchange their attention for a service or pay a few cents. Businesses could experiment with microtransactions that were previously impossible, from streaming payments for cloud storage to delivering premium search results on demand. If the GCUL model succeeds, Google's empire could shift from an almost exclusive reliance on advertising (which accounts for over 75% of Google's total revenue) to a more flexible, transaction-driven model. The debate over decentralization versus centralization will continue. I don't think developers will choose to build permissionless applications on GCUL. No one will set up yield farms or issue memecoins on Google's platform. Institutions already using Google Cloud and other enterprise tools are likely to be the primary adopters of GCUL. The goals are clear and practical: to move value across the internet with lower friction, reduce the hassle of reconciliation, and provide a trusted payment rail for banks and payment companies. As a retail user, I don't remember when I switched to Gmail. It simply became synonymous with email, just as Google became synonymous with web search. I didn't even know Google owned Android when I bought my first Android phone. If the Universal Ledger becomes seamless infrastructure, decentralization won't matter. It's just something that works. But that doesn't eliminate risks. Google is no stranger to antitrust scrutiny. US courts have previously ruled that the tech giant maintains a monopoly in search and advertising. Building financial rails will only intensify regulatory scrutiny. Libra's collapse demonstrates how quickly a project can unravel if central banks perceive their sovereignty as threatened. Currently, Google's UCL is still on testnet. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) has joined, and other partners are being actively pursued. Google plans a broader rollout in 2026. But I believe this ambition is well-deserved. Google is betting it can make the movement of money as boring, reliable, and invisible as typing in a search box. The story begins with a blank page and a search box. Its next chapter may be a ledger that no one sees but everyone uses.
Coinlive 
decrypt
Bitcoinist
Others
Tristan
链向资讯