Author: Cathy, Plain Language Blockchain
A couple of days ago, the Bitcoin ecosystem research and consulting team 1A1z published an in-depth report on the builders of Bitcoin Core.
The article, seemingly just a routine developer interview and survey, actually reveals a layer of reality in the crypto industry that is easily overlooked: there is a group of people who stay away from the center of attention, don't talk about narratives, don't do marketing, and have been maintaining the most basic and critical infrastructure of this industry for a long time.
In this list of sponsors supporting Bitcoin Core, OK's name is not in a prominent position. It is precisely because of this low profile that many people have realized for the first time: there are still large platforms in this industry that invest resources in "public research and development," something that may not yield short-term returns but will determine the long-term direction of the industry.
After the article was published, OK Star reposted and quoted a passage from within the team: "From the very beginning, we have insisted on contributing our modest efforts to the underlying development of Bitcoin. For the past ten years, we have never hyped or promoted ourselves, because we firmly believe in the future of blockchain." Similar expressions are not uncommon in the industry. However, when this statement is placed in the context of Bitcoin Core, its meaning is quite different—this is not a marketing slogan, but a value choice: the willingness to invest time, resources, and patience in areas where no one is paying attention. 01 The People Who Pay for Bitcoin's "Operating System" To understand the significance of this, we must first return to a core question: What exactly is Bitcoin Core? Simply put, Bitcoin Core is the "operating system" of Bitcoin. It is the software that runs on full nodes, the rule executor and transaction verifier of the entire network, and the foundation for maintaining Bitcoin's security, network consistency, and censorship resistance. The familiar BTC price, block height, transaction confirmation, and network stability—indicators mentioned countless times daily—all depend on the correct operation of the Bitcoin Core codebase. More importantly, Bitcoin Core has never been a commercial project since its inception. It has no CEO, no KPIs, no profit model, and no "return on investment cycle." It relies on the contributions of global volunteers and the long-term support of external sponsors. Some developers focus on network performance optimization, some research verification rules and security, some dedicate themselves to privacy improvements and user experience optimization, and some do work that ordinary users will never see, but the entire ecosystem cannot function without. Because Bitcoin Core has no profit model and no company backing, it needs external funding. A 1A1z report shows that sponsors supporting Bitcoin Core include foundations, research institutions, infrastructure companies, and a few trading platforms. These funds are primarily used for node performance optimization, security research, network synchronization, privacy enhancement, and code review. It's fair to say that without this continued support, Bitcoin Core would have struggled to maintain stable development for over a decade. The report identifies 13 major sponsoring organizations: Blockstream, Chaincode Labs, MIT, Spiral (formerly Square Crypto), OKEx, the Human Rights Foundation, Brink, Btrust, OpenSats, Vinteum, Maelstrom, B4OS, and 2140.

Image: Bitcoin Core's main sponsoring organizations, source: 1A1z
The criteria for being included in this core list are clear: long-term, stable, and low-profile.
This is why, although exchanges like Coinbase, Kraken, and Gemini have had developer funding programs in the past, they are not listed as core sponsors—the report points out that these projects are currently either inactive, infrequent, or no longer focused on Bitcoin development. In contrast, OKEx's funding program, which began in 2019, has continued to this day, making it the only exchange among the 13 core sponsors.
... Take Marco Falke as an example. He was one of only six core maintainers globally with the authority to approve or reject changes to Bitcoin's underlying code (he resigned in February 2023). His job was to rigorously review every proposal in the codebase to prevent malicious or flawed code from entering the Bitcoin protocol. This was crucial work for the global crypto economy, but it was unpaid. Since 2019, OK (and its predecessor Okcoin) has consistently provided funding to Falke, ensuring he could dedicate himself full-time to this vital work for cybersecurity. Besides Falke, OK has also funded Bitcoin Core developer Amiti Uttarwar, Lightning Network developer Antoine Riard, and non-profit organizations such as Brink and Vinteum. To date, OK's funding for these projects has reached nearly $2 million. In fact, Okcoin had already established an open-source developer funding program before 2019. It's worth noting that this investment was largely unpublicized for a long time. It wasn't until the recent 1A1z report that many people realized how many organizations and companies were quietly supporting the underlying infrastructure of Bitcoin. In this industry, most companies are chasing trends and creating narratives. These sponsors, however, are choosing to pay for things that "someone has to do, but no one is obligated to do." 02 Not Just the Underlying Layer, But Also the "Last Mile" Supporting the underlying protocol is only one aspect. What's more easily overlooked are the seemingly less "high-end" infrastructure components that determine whether users can truly use the platform. User-Side Barriers Take OK Wallet as an example; it has become the starting point for many people entering Web3. Support for hundreds of chains, multiple account models, self-custody and MPC technology, rapid ecosystem integration, and support for compliant chains—these may sound like "product details," but they are essentially "user-side infrastructure." For an industry to achieve large-scale application, these details determine whether the last mile can be successfully completed. Ordinary users don't care about the consensus algorithm used or how advanced the Layer 2 technology is; they care about: Is it easy to use? Will I lose my coins? Are the fees expensive? CeDeFi is designed to solve these problems—combining the advantages of centralized and decentralized exchanges. Users can access over 100 decentralized liquidity pools without leaving the platform, with the system automatically finding the best price. More importantly, there's no need to remember mnemonic phrases (using Passkey authentication) or cross-chain bridges (direct routing within the platform), solving the two biggest headaches for DeFi users: coin loss and hacking. These features may not seem appealing, but they are more important than the technology itself for mass adoption. The long-term vision of the developer ecosystem: Beyond the user side, OKEx has consistently driven the development of its developer ecosystem, test network, cross-chain infrastructure, hackathons, research collaborations, and auditing systems over the years. These investments may be far removed from trending topics, but they are more crucial for the healthy development of the industry. Hackathons don't directly bring in users, test networks don't generate transaction volume, and auditing systems don't create buzz. But without these, the developer ecosystem won't take off, security incidents will be frequent, and the foundation of trust in the entire industry will be eroded. To some extent, the driving force behind the crypto industry isn't just the transaction volume on the leaderboards and the weekly rotating narratives, but the people who write code, run nodes, test protocols, and fund infrastructure.
03 The Value of Long-Termism
The phrase "ten years of hard work" sounds like marketing rhetoric in the crypto industry. But looking at the numbers, some things are indeed happening.
Let's look at the industry situation in 2025: The number of tokens surged from hundreds of thousands in 2021 to tens of millions (over 50 million) in 2025. The token issuance cycle was compressed from two years to 3-6 months. Less than 20% of a project's total cost is actually spent on technology; the rest is poured into listing fees, market makers, KOLs, and media promotion (ICODA DeFi Marketing Budget Guide). In this environment, the difficulty lies in investing resources in underlying protocols, developer ecosystems, and user infrastructure—areas with "invisible returns"—because while short-term returns are not visible, long-term success or failure is crucial. This sustained investment will ultimately translate into competitiveness: Technological efficiency brings cost advantages. When your system processes data quickly and cheaply, you naturally have the space to offer users better prices. This isn't a price war; it's a technological dividend. User experience determines large-scale adoption. No need to remember mnemonic phrases, no worries about cross-chain hacking, and the system automatically finding the best price—these features address real pain points. Good attention to detail keeps users engaged. Infrastructure development determines future capacity. When the RWA market truly reaches $600 billion by 2030 (as predicted by Boston Consulting Group), the infrastructure capable of supporting these asset transfers will become the scarcest resource. At that time, those who have positioned themselves early will have the greatest first-mover advantage. This is the value of long-termism: laying the foundation while others chase trends, and completing the skyscraper by the time others realize it. 04 Summary Industry trends have cycles, but Bitcoin's development has no. Market hype may rise and fall, but the underlying infrastructure needs to be built and maintained over ten or twenty years. This is perhaps the most difficult yet most important thing in the industry. In this sense, participants like OKEx deserve attention not because of their publicity, but because they choose to do things that "someone in the industry must do" but "no one is obligated to do." Builders don't necessarily need applause, but they deserve to be seen. And where the crypto industry will ultimately go largely depends on these unseen choices.