Vitalik Buterin has expressed concerns about the declining enthusiasm for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and their internal voting mechanisms over the past decade. According to Foresight News, this shift is attributed to a transition from a 'stable era' to a 'chaotic era.' In the stable era, there was a vision for a more perfect order, whereas the chaotic era is characterized by interventions driven by selfish power struggles, with democratic mechanisms adopting a more conservative defensive stance, making long-term success challenging.
Buterin suggests that in the chaotic era, democratic tools should focus on 'consensus discovery' rather than rigid decision-making. He highlights the potential of anonymous voting systems like Pol.is, where initial votes or statements remain anonymous and become public once a certain support threshold is reached. This approach could help highly decentralized groups express their views and demonstrate broad support to those in power.
Using the situation in Iran as an example, Buterin emphasizes the need for tools that enable the collective voice of the Iranian people to have an immediate impact, rather than relying solely on future changes in order.