Texas Court Delivers Major Setback to SEC's Expanded Definition of Dealer
A significant blow to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) came on 21 November 2024, as a Texas federal court ruled to throw out the SEC's controversial rule that expanded the definition of a securities dealer.
The ruling is seen as a crucial legal defeat for SEC Chair Gary Gensler, whose tenure has been marked by ongoing battles over the regulation of the cryptocurrency sector.
The ruling specifically targeted the SEC's attempt to broaden its jurisdiction, including crypto firms within the scope of the dealer definition.
Court Slams SEC for Overreach
The court, located in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, delivered its decision after a legal challenge from the Blockchain Association and the Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas.
Judge Reed O’Connor, who previously dealt with a case involving ConsenSys and the SEC, ruled that the SEC had exceeded its statutory authority by enacting a definition that was “untethered from the text, history, and structure of the Exchange Act.”
This sharply critical assessment led to the rule being rejected outright.
The SEC had aimed to extend its control over crypto businesses by redefining the term "dealer" to include a broader range of firms, many of which were not traditionally involved in securities dealing.
The regulation would have imposed heavy burdens on decentralised finance (DeFi) platforms, while also potentially catching crypto traders who did not offer dealer services.
The court's decision directly contradicts the SEC's ongoing push to tighten its grip on the crypto industry.
The SEC's Legal Loss and Its Impact on Gensler’s Legacy
The ruling represents another in a series of legal setbacks for the SEC under Gensler's leadership, particularly in relation to crypto.
Just hours before the court's decision, Gensler had announced that he would step down in January, a move that was coincidentally linked to a string of high-profile defeats for the agency regarding its efforts to regulate the rapidly growing digital asset market.
In a statement following the decision, an SEC spokesperson said,
"We’re reviewing the decision and will determine next steps as appropriate."
The decision marked a sharp contrast to the rhetoric Gensler had used in recent speeches, where he boasted of the SEC’s success in pushing forward its regulatory agenda and protecting investors.
Crypto Industry Welcomes the Ruling
Industry groups that opposed the SEC's rule have hailed the court's decision as a major victory.
Kristin Smith, CEO of the Blockchain Association, praised the ruling as a win for the crypto sector:
“The dealer rule was an attempt by the SEC to advance the agency’s anti-crypto crusade, unlawfully redefining the boundaries of its statutory authority granted by Congress. Following today’s ruling, the agency’s overreach is rolled back and the digital asset industry is protected from this unlawful rule.”
The ruling's impact is likely to reverberate throughout the regulatory landscape, with the crypto industry viewing it as a clear sign that legal challenges to SEC overreach may succeed in the courts.
Smith’s statement encapsulated the sentiment of the broader industry, which has been under increasing pressure from the SEC’s aggressive stance towards digital assets.
SEC's Broad Crypto Push Faces Legal Resistance
The SEC’s attempt to capture more crypto businesses under its regulatory framework had been part of a broader effort to assert its authority over the digital asset space.
However, with this latest court decision, the SEC has been forced to retreat, at least temporarily, from its attempt to expand its reach.
The court's intervention reflects a growing sentiment in the legal community that the SEC's regulatory power has limits, particularly when it comes to defining entities that fall within its jurisdiction.
This legal loss also serves as a reminder of the challenges the SEC faces in its quest to regulate the fast-moving and complex world of cryptocurrency.
With the court's decision rolling back the rule, the industry has found a temporary reprieve from what many viewed as a heavy-handed approach by the regulator.
Joy
Brian
Kikyo
Alex