Colin Butler, Executive Vice President of Capital Markets at fintech company Mega Matrix, stated that regulatory uncertainty surrounding stablecoins could put traditional banks at a greater disadvantage than crypto companies. He pointed out that many banks have invested heavily in building digital asset infrastructure, but boards and compliance departments are hesitant to approve full deployment until regulations clarify whether stablecoins will be considered deposits, securities, or independent payment instruments. Several large banks have already begun related initiatives, such as JPMorgan Chase's Onyx blockchain payment network, BNY Mellon's digital asset custody service, and Citigroup's testing of tokenized deposits. However, Butler noted that regulatory ambiguity limits the scalability of these investments, while crypto companies, having long operated in a gray area of regulation, are more adaptable. Furthermore, the yield gap between stablecoin platforms and bank deposits could also drive capital migration. Butler stated that most exchanges offer approximately 4% to 5% yield on stablecoin balances, while the average US savings account yield is less than 0.5%, leading to a rapid flow of funds when higher yields become available. Butler also warned that if regulators restrict stablecoin yields, it could push funds towards less regulated structures, such as synthetic dollar tokens like USDe that generate yields through derivatives strategies, thus driving capital flows to less transparent offshore markets. Sygnum's Chief Investment Officer, Fabian Dori, believes that while the competitive gap between banks and crypto platforms is widening, the likelihood of a large-scale outflow of deposits in the short term remains limited. However, he pointed out that once stablecoins are viewed as yield-generating digital cash, bank deposits will face more significant competitive pressure. (Cointelegraph)