Cobie questioned Bankless Lianchuang, claiming that he did not participate in governance but applied for 30% of BANK tokens

Crypto KOL Cobie questioned Bankless co-founder Ryan Sean Adams on the ?” Ryan Sean Adams said that because Cobie did not accept his attention, he could not reply or view his tweets. In addition, Cobie said in response to Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's remarks: "The grant you originally received (accounting for 25% of BANK supply) was for 'continuous participation.' Now you say 'it has nothing to do with this and no participation.' .I'm pretty sure you changed your mind. Obviously you were originally (during the bull market) excited about owning a DAO, and you wanted to participate. But then you thought about the implications, or maybe the price dropped, and you wanted to stay away. If If you never sell tokens and don’t participate in governance, there’s no reason to want to own 25% of the token supply.” According to previous news, Bankless co-founder Ryan Sean Adams posted on the X platform that people are uneasy about BanklessDAO’s proposal to apply for ARB funding from Arbitrum, and confused BanklessDAO and Bankless. But BanklessDAO is a completely independent entity from Bankless and is a true community DAO. Ryan, fellow co-founder David Hoffman, and Bankless have no financial interests from the DAO, have never sold BANK tokens, and have not participated in the DAO's governance voting. Ryan and David allow the DAO and those who share the Bankless values ​​to freely use the brand, but the pair realize that doing so may cause confusion and may require adjustments to the approach in the future. In this regard, encryption KOL Udi Wertheimer said that the DAO can be renamed directly. Ryan joked: "Okay, now it is renamed Udi DAO."