Why is it alarmist that Geth centralization will lead to the loss of Staking assets?
Articles claiming that using Geth client staking will lead to asset loss are too alarmist.

Articles claiming that using Geth client staking will lead to asset loss are too alarmist.
Ethereum's stability teeters on a fine balance due to over-reliance on the Geth client, with Lido Finance at the forefront of this precarious situation. However, efforts towards diversification and innovation hint at a future where reliance is distributed, not centralised.
Collapsed cryptocurrency lending platform Celsius has announced that it will withdraw $1.6 billion worth of Ethereum it had previously staked on the chain.
Maverick launched a decentralized exchange designed to compete with Uniswap, in partnership with Lido, Liquity, and Galxe.
Lido Finance has overtaken MakerDAO as the biggest DeFi protocol in the market, with $5.9 billion locked on the staking platform.
Lido’s liquid staking derivative token has over 90% of the Ethereum market share as the network ultimately transitions to proof-of-stake.
For Vasily Shapovalov, the magnitude of the proof-of-stake transition could cause unforeseeable problems.
Lido Finance has announced plans to offer its ETH staking services across the entire L2 system, as long as specific networks have “demonstrated economic activity.”
A renewed focus on decentralization, the steady growth of DeFi’s liquid staking sector and investment from institutions could benefit LDO token in the long-term.