Opinion: Jupiter trading platform has defense mechanisms and is unlikely to be attacked by Hyperliquid

Odaily Planet Daily News In response to the recent $13 million attack on Hyperliquid, some Solana community members questioned whether Jupiter's JLP risk library has similar vulnerabilities. In this regard, the analysis believes that Jupiter has a structural defense mechanism and is unlikely to encounter similar attacks. First, Jupiter only supports mainstream assets with sufficient liquidity such as SOL, ETH, and wBTC, while Hyperliquid allows tokens with lower liquidity (such as JELLY) to be traded, making it easier to manipulate. Secondly, Hyperliquid relies on internal order book matching, and attackers can use limit orders to manipulate prices, while Jupiter uses external oracles such as Pyth to provide prices, making it difficult to influence market prices through a single platform. In addition, Jupiter adopts a strict risk control mechanism, and all transactions are directly borne by JLP, without involving secondary risk libraries or manual intervention, to ensure the stability of transaction execution. Although JLP still needs to deal with risks such as unilateral market trends, it balances pool risks through dynamic adjustments to lending rates. (Blockworks)