1.5 BTC stored in garbled code, peeling off the cocoon to find the truth
If you are not crazy, you will not survive.
There is no final news about the Bitcoin spot ETF, and people can’t bear the fun, but the price may be high.
First someone sent millions of dollars in Bitcoin to Satoshi Nakamoto’s address, and the crowd exclaimed that the leader was resurrected. On January 7, another unknown rich man spent money He bought 1.5 BTC, which is about $66,000, and engraved 8.93 MB of garbled data on the Bitcoin mainnet.
This world is so crazy that even Inscriptions are bridesmaids for the SEC.
Data remains forever, Arweave’s unique skills are not recognized by the market
The masses are shocked In addition, people are also speculating on its use and intention. Arweave founder Sam also said, "Arweave only costs 0.06 US dollars to store the same amount of files, which is about one millionth of Bitcoin. He also said that Arweave has experienced five years of Years of operation are enough to pass the test of the market."
To be honest, Sam's statement is not entirely a hot topic. Arweave was indeed famous for its "permanent storage" concept at the earliest, but its network scale is generally small, and the community is not united. At least Irys was having a split a few days ago.
I would also like to mention the follow-up by the way. Sam and Irys have reconciled and they are no longer separated, but this open contradiction within the ecosystem is so I can't comment on the hasty ending. At least in terms of stability, Arweave still needs a longer period of testing to at least ensure that the data itself will not be forked.
As a result, the permanence of Bitcoin has been strengthened. Whether Arweave can guarantee the storage time of 200 years is uncertain, but everyone believes that there is no big problem for Bitcoin to survive to 2140. , after all, Bitcoin’s five rounds of bulls and bears and a market value of trillions are no joke.
Before the final results of the Bitcoin spot ETF are released, there will be a lot of "spending work" like this. Will anyone really believe that spending 66000 X 7.17 = 473,220 RMB Is it just a joke? !
A reasonable guess is that I think this should be a show by ORDI. As Conan said, there is always only one truth. Of course, Sherlock Holmes also said, When you have eliminated the impossibles, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
Behind the whole work, the speculation of the second batch of inscriptions cannot be ruled out
If the water flows as intended, Mu The birds return together.
Today's inscription market has reached an inflection point. According to CMC data, the trend of inscriptions has been declining in the past week. It seems that $100 has become an elusive beauty. Dream, how to attract more attention?
An optional way is to make money. 66,000 US dollars is a lot for individual retail investors, but for a certain project party or banker, it is difficult to say how expensive it is. Public relations expenses, but it has already made headlines in major media, and the "out of the circle" effect is unparalleled.
Moreover, the recent Bitcoin mainnet handling fees have dropped by almost 80% in a week. Compared with the daily 300+ BTC a week ago, Since January, there have been basically only about 150 BTC, which is close to halved. On the 7th, there were only 70+ BTC. If it continues to fall like this, let alone waiting for the Bitcoin spot ETF currency price to skyrocket, even the inscription handling fees for drought and flood guarantees will be charged. Gone.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence). There is currently no evidence, and the whole article is only speculation:
Anonymous address
Invalid information (garbled data )
Use the inscription protocol instead of the usual Bitcoin block burning method
< p style="text-align: left;">When the inscription ecology is weak
By sorting out the above information, personally The possibility of errors has basically been eliminated. If you are an old player OG who often uses inscriptions, you will not be unfamiliar with the operation methods of inscriptions, and you will definitely not make mistakes all the time. Then there is the possibility of personal retention of important information, because it is currently visible. The information is completely garbled data, and the real way of encrypting data will not be so sloppy.
After excluding the above possibilities, there are only two more reliable choices:
Performance art, if you don’t spend your money, you will be blind;
Public relations activities, old leeks who have experienced the sky-high price of NFT era should be deeply impressed. In 2021, Beeple's works were auctioned for US$69 million, writing the best for the crazy last bull market footnote;
The price is high enough to attract attention. In this reasoning logic, this is the most likely answer. Of course, if it is true It's understandable that I went crazy when I was heartbroken, even if I was wrong.
Conclusion
The inscription Fiery has always been a quantum superposition state of fluctuations, and it has gone through so far 3 small cycles, but the succession has been relatively perfect since October 2023, but the current inscription is not very active visible to the naked eye. If a new firewood is added at this time, the Indian Summer may continue.
The above comments are all speculation. If there is any dispute, am I right?
References:
< ol class=" list-paddingleft-2">
Someone spent $66,000 to inscribe data onto Bitcoin. No one knows what it says.
Gain a broader understanding of the crypto industry through informative reports, and engage in in-depth discussions with other like-minded authors and readers. You are welcome to join us in our growing Coinlive community:https://t.me/CoinliveSG