Author: Zhou, ChainCatcher
The crypto market continues its slump. Since November, the price of Ethereum has fallen by nearly 40% from its peak, and ETFs have seen continuous net outflows. In this systemic retreat, BitMine, the largest Ethereum treasury, has become a focus of attention. Peter Thiel's Founders Fund has reduced its holdings in BMNR by half, while Cathie Wood's ARK Invest and JPMorgan Chase have chosen to increase their holdings against the trend.
The polarized attitude of capital has put BitMine's "5% alchemy" on the spot: 3.56 million ETH, 3 billion unrealized losses, and mNAV falling to 0.8. As one of the last bastions of Ethereum buying, how long can BitMine continue to buy? Is there a value mismatch? After the DAT flywheel stalls, who will take over the ETH? I. BitMine's 5% alchemy: How long can the funds sustain it? BitMine, the second-largest cryptocurrency treasury company after MicroStrategy, had planned to purchase tokens equivalent to 5% of the total Ethereum supply in the future. On November 17th, BitMine announced that its Ethereum holdings had reached 3.56 million, accounting for nearly 3% of the circulating supply, more than halfway to its long-term goal of 6 million. In addition, the company currently holds approximately $11.8 billion in crypto assets and cash, including 192 Bitcoins, $607 million in uncollateralized cash, and 13.7 million shares of Eightco Holdings stock. Since launching its large-scale cryptocurrency accumulation plan in July, BitMine has become a focus of the market. During that period, the company's stock price rose in tandem with the price of Ethereum, and the story of "increasing market capitalization through cryptocurrency" was seen by investors as a new model in the crypto space. However, as the market cooled and liquidity tightened, market sentiment began to reverse. The decline in Ethereum's price has made BitMine's aggressive buying pace appear even more risky. Based on an average purchase price of $4,009, BitMine's unrealized losses are approaching $3 billion. Although Chairman Tom Lee has repeatedly expressed bullish views on Ethereum and stated that he will continue to add to his holdings at lower prices, investors' focus has shifted from "how much more can be bought" to "how long can it hold out?" Currently, BitMine's cash reserves are approximately $607 million, primarily funded through two channels. Firstly, there's the revenue from crypto assets. BitMine relies on immersion-cooled Bitcoin mining and consulting services for short-term cash flow, while simultaneously investing in Ethereum staking to pursue long-term returns. The company stated that its ETH holdings will be pledged, generating approximately $400 million in net proceeds. Secondly, there's secondary market financing. The company launched an ATM stock sale program, a mechanism that allows it to sell new shares at any time to obtain cash without pre-setting a price or size. To date, the company has issued hundreds of millions of dollars worth of shares, attracting investment from numerous institutional investors, including well-known institutions such as ARK, JPMorgan Chase, and Fidelity. Tom Lee stated that when institutions buy large amounts of BMNR, these funds will be used to purchase ETH. Through the dual-engine approach of accumulating ETH and generating revenue, BitMine is attempting to reshape the logic of corporate capital allocation, but changes in the market environment are weakening the stability of this model. In terms of stock price, BitMine (BMNR) is facing some pressure, having fallen about 80% from its July high. Its current market capitalization is approximately $9.2 billion, lower than its ETH holdings value of $10.6 billion (based on an ETH price of $3,000). Its mNAV has fallen to 0.86, reflecting market concerns about the company's unrealized losses and the sustainability of its funding.

II. The Last Straw for ETH Price: Three Visible Factors of Widespread Divergence in Purchasing Power and a Decline in Staking
From a macro perspective, the Federal Reserve released hawkish signals, reducing the probability of a December rate cut, leading to overall weakness in the crypto market and a significant decline in risk appetite.

BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes recently stated that even though dollar liquidity has contracted since April 9th, ETF inflows and DAT purchases have enabled Bitcoin to rise, but this situation has ended.
... Insufficient basis spreads are preventing institutional investors from consistently buying ETFs, and most DATs trade at a discount to mNAV, leading investors to avoid these derivative securities. The same applies to Ethereum, especially given the declining staking ecosystem. Beaconchain data shows that Ethereum's daily active validators have fallen by about 10% since July, reaching their lowest level since April 2024. This is the first time such a significant drop has occurred since the network switched from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanisms in September 2022. The decline is mainly due to two factors: First, the surge in Ethereum's price this year led to an unprecedented high in validator exits from the queue, prompting staking operators to scramble to cancel their stakes and sell them for profit. Second, declining staking yields and rising borrowing costs have made leveraged staking unprofitable. The current annualized staking yield for Ethereum is approximately 2.9%, far below the historical high of 8.6% set in May 2023. With all three major buying channels under pressure and the staking ecosystem receding, Ethereum's price support faces a structural test in the next phase. Although BitMine is still being bought, it is almost fighting alone. If even BitMine, this last pillar, can no longer be bought, the market will lose more than just a stock or a wave of funds; it could lose the very foundation of the entire Ethereum narrative. III. Does BitMine suffer from a value mismatch? Having discussed the funding chain and the retreat of buying pressure, a more fundamental question arises: Is the story of BitMine truly over? The current market pricing clearly doesn't fully grasp its structural differences. Compared to MicroStrategy's path, BitMine chose a completely different strategy from the very beginning. MicroStrategy relies heavily on secondary market fundraising through convertible bonds and preferred stock, incurring hundreds of millions of dollars in annual interest burdens, and its profitability depends on the unilateral rise of Bitcoin. BitMine, while diluting its equity through new share issuances, has virtually no interest-bearing debt. Furthermore, its holdings of ETH contribute approximately $400-500 million annually in staking income. This cash flow is relatively rigid, and its correlation with price fluctuations is far lower than that of Strategy's debt costs. More importantly, this income is not the end goal. As one of the world's largest institutional holders of ETH, BitMine could easily use its staked ETH for restaking (earning an extra 1-2%), operating node infrastructure, locking in fixed returns through yield tokenization (e.g., a certain return of around 3.5%), and even issuing institutional-grade ETH structured notes—operations that MicroStrategy's BTC holdings cannot achieve. However, BitMine (BMNR) currently trades at a discount of approximately 13% to its ETH holdings on the US stock market. Within the entire DAT sector, this discount isn't the most extreme, but it's significantly lower than the historical pricing average for similar assets. Bearish sentiment amplifies the visual impact of unrealized losses, to some extent obscuring the value of the earnings buffer and ecosystem options. Recent institutional actions seem to have captured this discrepancy. On November 6th, ARK Invest added 215,000 shares (US$8.06 million); JPMorgan Chase held 1.97 million shares at the end of the third quarter. This wasn't blind bottom-fishing, but rather based on a judgment of the long-term compound growth of the ETH ecosystem. Once the price of Ethereum stabilizes or rebounds moderately, the relative stability of returns may make BitMine's mNAV recovery path steeper than that of purely leveraged treasuries. Whether a value mismatch truly exists is already clear; the remaining question is when the market will be willing to pay for scarcity. The current discount is both a risk and the starting point of divergence. As Tom Lee stated, the pain is short-term and will not change the ETH supercycle. Of course, it may also not change BitMine's core role in this cycle.