Author: Sandao, Source: Author's Twitter: @sdcrypto123
Today's industry has undergone the following visible changes:
(1) The number of people who arbitrage and profiteer has greatly increased.
In the past, everyone could only hold their own coins in the secondary market for speculation, but now about 1/5 of the users have switched to arbitrage and profiteer in the semi-primary market. This group of people has a characteristic that they are relatively averse to buying coins in the secondary market. They can profiteer, fight (inscriptions), donate (memes), and pledge, but they just don't buy. If this ratio increases accordingly, it means that there are fewer people buying coins in the secondary market, and more people who want to unload at a low cost
(2) Hotspots are dispersed
Restake, inscriptions, NFT, Solana ecology, modularization, and second-layer network. This bull market has no hot spots that everyone can participate in, which is very different from the past. Funds and users have no joint efforts at all. Everyone is playing their own games in a scattered and disorderly manner. The reasons for this are, first of all, the problem of industry development. The industry has become so large and broad that it is basically impossible for one person to play all the games in the industry. Second, the industry lacks truly innovative products that can arouse imagination again. It is more of an improved bull market (micro-innovation based on previous innovations). (3) The market value of too many projects has been overdrawn in advance. Now everyone has their own judgment on which projects are good and which projects are bragging. It is difficult to buy good and cheap things. For example, Ethereum's two second-layer networks, OP and ARB, have reached their peak since their debut. The current price is basically the same as when they were first launched 1-2 years ago. In fact, ARB is even lower than the price when it was launched.
Good things are not cheap, and good things and making money are two different things
(4) Funds have not flowed into the cryptocurrency circle
In the past, investment institutions in the industry were all knowledgeable people. In addition to understanding BTC, they also understood Ethereum. In addition to understanding Ethereum, they would also actively invest in various innovative coins.
But this time is different. After the ETF, the funds invested in BTC did not directly circulate on the chain, but stayed in other markets thousands of miles away. This money only circulated on BTC, and had basically no interest in innovative coins or investments outside of BTC.
It can be said that the institutions that entered in the last two rounds all understood the industry and brought money to invest in the industry, while many of the new institutions in this round are only interested in BTC (as a hedge configuration).
So whether Ethereum can successfully pass the ETF this year is actually very important, which determines whether it can have a large amount of new funds to invest in it.If there is no ETF, it is really not that easy to rely on the existing institutions in the market to violently push the market value and unit price of Ethereum.
(5) Extremely intensified competition
The intensified competition is manifested in two aspects:One is that there are a lot of new competitors, and the other is that the strength of the new competitors is very strong.In 2023, when the on-chain derivatives and restake just showed signs, a large number of competitors swarmed in. This year, many situations that are contrary to past experience have occurred: the track is getting bigger, but the share of the early players with advantages is shrinking. This situation can be said to have occurred in every track at the same time, not just derivatives. The result of this change is: buying the big boss and holding the big boss, but the price may not necessarily rise smoothly and significantly, because the market share and imagination have not risen accordingly, and it is even possible that the position has become shaky under the pressure of some new competitors.
This change in the industry is one cycle faster than I expected. I originally thought that it would not really come until this cycle is over, but I didn’t expect that we are already at this moment.
Look up at the stars, but also be down-to-earth; have dreams, but also respect reality.
In such a new development cycle (transition from the dividend period to the stable development period), each person’s wisdom needs to be tested. If it is handled well and adjusted well, the wealth of the dividend period can continue to grow smoothly (but it will become slower); if it is not handled well, or the old logic is still used to deal with future investment and speculation, it may gradually give up profits and have a wealth daydream that has lasted for many years.
The adjustment I made to myself in this bull market is: after half a year, try to lower expectations as much as possible, and at the same time increase the proportion of reducing positions.