Source: Daoshuo Blockchain
There was something that surprised me about Saturday’s sharing.
Because the original Twitter account was blocked, we re-applied for a new account. This is the first time I use this new account to communicate with you online, so I originally thought that there should not be many students who leave messages and ask questions in this exchange, so I originally planned to share with you for a longer time:
- The possible economic trend of the country in the next 10 to 15 years;
- The possible market trend of my country’s assets under this trend;
- How individuals can allocate and invest assets to hedge various possible risks under this trend
I didn’t expect that the number of questions in the message actually exceeded the number of questions in any previous online communication.
Therefore, after answering everyone’s questions, I could only use the last half hour to share the above three questions with you. Because the time was very short, I couldn’t elaborate on many logics that would have taken at least two hours or even longer to explain clearly, so in the last half hour of sharing, I mainly expressed my opinions and conclusions.
In the last half hour of sharing, I spoke some things quite bluntly. In order to avoid unnecessary complications, I deleted all the recordings. I hope you can understand.
But for the first half hour of sharing, I think some topics can be expanded in detail in the article.
Many of these topics are about AI agents, and many students left messages asking about the Virtual platform.
I checked the records of WeChat articles, and the first time I wrote about Virtual's website in an article was in an article on October 31. When I wrote this article, I was not sure about this platform. As I wrote in the article, I just regarded it as a platform similar to ICO for financing AI agents.
Previously, I wrote about another project related to AI financing, which is ORA's IMO. However, after observing for a period of time, IMO did not become popular, so I gradually lost interest in the application of this financing method in AI. Therefore, when I found Virtual, it was just a curiosity, and I introduced it to everyone purely as knowledge sharing.
But what's interesting is that under the comments of this article, none of them asked about this project or this project token. So I was curious:
- Have any readers visited this platform based on the information in the article?
- If you have read it, do you have any thoughts or feedback? Even negative feedback is fine.
I remember that when I first introduced Bored Ape in an article in 2021, there was at least a comment from a reader. Although it was negative, it was still a feedback.
No matter how difficult it is to understand the Virtual project, it is better than NFT, right?
Are there any readers who will take a serious look?
About a month later, in the article on December 2, I used a whole article to introduce this interview with Lianchuang in detail. Because I think many of his thoughts and opinions are very good and very much in line with my appetite.
I always emphasize in my articles that the first thing I look at when looking at a project is the founder of the project. If the founder of a project is qualified, the project track is good, and the strategy is generally suitable, the project is generally worthy of careful attention.
Therefore, I think the Virtual ecosystem has the potential to take off.
But there is still no feedback or comments about this project in the comments of that article.
I am also curious: Has any reader read the interview carefully this time? If so, does any reader have any ideas about this project?
The reason why I have this doubt comes from my own experience and lessons.
I wrote in a very early article that I did not recognize the value of Bitcoin the first time I heard about it, so I missed a very early dividend.
But later when everyone still said it was CX, I decided to be ruthless and study Bitcoin seriously:
Even if it is CX, I want to see how it is CX.
This study changed the trajectory of my life.
This incident gave me a great experience/lesson:
In this ecosystem, when I find something new, whether it is good or bad, I should pursue my inner curiosity and learn about it carefully.
If you understand it, as long as it is not too outrageous, too anti-bottom-line, or too far from your appetite, you can boldly try it while controlling the risks;
If you do not participate after understanding it because of insufficient cognition, there is nothing to regret - after all, you have tried your best;
But if you do not even understand it, just treat it as news or information, and throw it away after reading it, you may lose a major opportunity.
Therefore, I often call on everyone in my articles to arouse their curiosity in their hearts, be more curious about the new things in this ecosystem, and explore more boldly.
Opportunities are often found by curiosity and desire for exploration.
Without curiosity and desire for exploration, you may not be able to seize the opportunity even if it is right in front of you.
Alex
Brian
Weiliang
Joy
Miyuki