The year began with a clear public signal that the center of gravity was shifting. In early October, Hyperliquid launched permissionless listings (HIP-3). Now, builders can list perpetual contract markets by staking 500,000 HYPE, with restrictions such as validator penalties and open interest caps. This move coincided with decentralized perpetual swaps reaching new highs in their battle for market share with CEXs, fueling the narrative that "on-chain is winning." Meanwhile, CZ (Binance founder) addressed rumors of Hyperliquid ties on X, even weighing in on a widely discussed thread about "shorting $1 billion on Hyperliquid." Whether you interpret this as concern or simple rumor control, the Binance founder's public mention of a DEX clearly illustrates where attention has shifted.

There are three levers that drive profit and loss (PnL):
Execution and Slippage (Latency, Depth, Queuing)
Liquidation Design (Mark Price vs Index Price; Auto-Deleveraging ADL vs Insurance Fund)
Fee Surface (Classic Maker/Taker vs Zero Fee/Profit Sharing)
Rather than simply listing tables, the following will be organized according to how each platform uses these levers, interspersed with indicators to explain their behavior.
Appchain CLOBs: When Latency Becomes a Feature (and Reflects in PnL)
Hyperliquid's HIP-3 transforms the supply side of liquidity. After listing became permissionless (requiring only a 500,000 HYPE deposit), the long-tail market is no longer a flash in the pan. You can see that open interest survived the first funding rate cycle without evaporating, and liquidity on days 3/7 was still sufficient to support large trades. This stickiness, combined with consistently top-tier daily trading volumes, explains why traders now assume Hyperliquid has depth in "niche" trading pairs when planning their trades—because it often does.
The Shift in Market Share (and Why It’s Sticky)
Three data points form the structural argument:
DEX perpetual contracts climb to low-to-mid 20% market share by mid-2025—up from ~4%–6% in 2024. This isn’t seasonality; this is a growth curve.
The DEX to CEX futures volume ratio hits a record ~0.23 in Q2 2025, echoing multiple market data sources. Hyperliquid's permissionless listing and public CZ discussions amplified this narrative as these ratios hit new highs. The timing was unmistakable: DEXs are no longer fringe players—they have entered the mainstream conversation. Solana's Three-Rail Ecosystem (How to Plan Trade Flow) Drift is enduring—maintaining consistent depth, low slippage across margins, and major trading pairs at ~$300M in daily volume. When it reached over $1B in 24-hour volume, traders using the same order volume compared prices across platforms and used Drift as a benchmark. Pacifica is about speed—even in invite-only beta, it's clocking over $600M in daily trading volume, competing with Drift in the same hour, making it a true alternative, not just "points volume." Bullet is about raw speed—it's the millisecond-level channel for event trading, the place you need to route trades when a single pip of slippage can wipe out your entire trade's profit. Starknet's CLOB cluster (no longer a science project) Extended and Paradex regularly reach hundreds of millions of dollars in daily trading volume and tens of billions of dollars in a 30-day window. What matters is their characteristics: Extended shows a shallower slippage curve on major trading pairs than a "younger" platform, while Paradex's $0 taker fee is indeed cheaper during off-peak hours - until spreads widen around news events. Trading routes need to be adjusted in real time.
 isn't TVL; it's execution quality with privacy—when you don't broadcast your inventory, are your execution prices and slippage in line with expectations? Extreme leverage is a slogan, not a plan )
How to Choose — Practical, Indicator-Driven
Execution First. Measure realized slippage and order cancellation/replacement latency during CPI/FOMC/ETF meeting minute releases. If milliseconds and queue position matter, Lisk/zk CLOBs—Hyperliquid, EdgeX, Bullet, Lighter, ApeX—tend to win.
Fees Second. Backtest ZFP (pay from profit) vs. RPI ($0 taker fee) based on order size and volatility; the "cheapest" platform varies hourly, not monthly. Liquidations are third. When depth thins, favor small markers—index price gaps (Reya), proven liquidation paths (Lighter), or RFQ hedging (Variational). Always verify liquidity. Use 24/7/30-day volume and open interest (OI) for a common-sense check—then send real test orders on your trading pairs (not just BTC/ETH).
2026 Configuration, One Sentence Summary
Run a speed platform (Hyperliquid/EdgeX/Bullet), a fee model hedging platform (Avantis ZFP or Paradex RPI), and a chain-native option you trust (Drift/Pacifica on Solana; Extended/Paradex on Starknet). Then let latency, proofs, effective fees, and liquidation logic—measured by your order volume—determine where you click to open a position.