According to PANews, the management of crypto assets can lead to various outcomes depending on market conditions and strategic decisions. When asset prices significantly exceed their acquisition costs, stakeholders may opt to liquidate holdings to meet shareholder or tax obligations, despite minor impacts on unrealized gains. This strategy, previously employed by MicroStrategy for tax optimization, did not result in market disruption.
In scenarios where substantial profits are achieved, investors might diversify into other cryptocurrencies, replicating their success with Ethereum-based decentralized autonomous organizations (DATs) by exploring alternative altcoins.
Conversely, if assets are perceived to be nearing their peak value, investors may halt purchases and prepare to offload holdings. Despite the transparency of blockchain addresses, they can discreetly hedge through contracts and options, preserving some gains.
If the market value of net assets (mNAV) remains below one for an extended period, companies might refrain from issuing new shares, opting instead to sell some assets to boost mNAV. Historical evidence suggests that only dual-collateralized anchors are effective, as psychological anchors alone are insufficient.
Financial pressures, similar to Tesla's 2022 decision to sell three-quarters of its Bitcoin holdings, could compel institutions to liquidate assets under duress. Additionally, if investment strategies backfire, with acquisition costs exceeding current prices, entities may be forced to cut losses and attempt recovery from lower price points.
These scenarios are speculative and do not reflect a current bearish outlook on DATs. The continuation of market activities is advised until key indicators suggest otherwise. These indicators include acquisition costs, changes in executive leadership, and prolonged mNAV below one, which will be discussed in a future analysis.
Catherine
Hui Xin
Brian
Clement
Alex
Jasper
Aaron