Recently, the evil wind of RWA (Real World Assets, tokenization of real world assets) has been blowing wildly in mainland social media. From the blockchain circle to the financial circle, from self-media to investment groups, it seems that overnight, RWA has become synonymous with financial freedom. Various "RWA project parties", "full-case service providers" and "teaching teachers" have sprung up like mushrooms after rain, and they all swear to tell you that RWA is the next outlet, and you will regret it for the rest of your life if you miss it. However, the more lively this circle is, the more smoky it becomes, with people cutting leeks, speculating in the air, and selling anxiety, all mixed up. I really can't help but want to pour a basin of cold water - this circle is now a pot of boiling shit soup, with a few leek leaves floating on the surface, and sickles bubbling underneath.
Today, let's not talk about technical details, but peel off this layer of the emperor's new clothes and talk about the 10 most heartbreaking truths in the RWA circle. Fasten your seat belts, let's drive straight.
Truth 1: RWA is a financing tool, not a myth of wealth
When many people hear about RWA, they imagine a picture of getting rich overnight, thinking that just throwing any asset on the blockchain can turn it into a glittering "wealth code". Wake up! The core of RWA is to tokenize real-world assets through blockchain technology and turn them into tradable digital assets. To put it bluntly, it is a financing tool that helps companies revitalize their assets or gives investors more choices. It is not a lottery, nor is it a money printing machine.
Do you think that buying RWA tokens is equivalent to buying "future 100-fold coins"? Don't dream. The income model of RWA is no different from traditional financial products, relying on the cash flow or appreciation potential of the underlying assets. Those who always shout "Invest in RWA, wealth freedom" are most likely trying to cut your leeks. RWA can help companies solve financing problems, but it has nothing to do with the fantasy of ordinary people like you and me getting rich.
Truth 2: Mainland Chinese users can basically not buy the real compliant RWA
If you think RWA is a "feast that everyone can participate in", then I have to pour the first bucket of cold water on you: the real compliant RWA products, such as those issued by Hong Kong and Singapore, are basically out of the hands of mainland Chinese users. Why? Because compliant RWA products must comply with strict financial supervision. The issuer must ensure that the identity of the investor and the source of funds are legal, and must comply with local securities laws, anti-money laundering laws and other regulations.
Hong Kong's RWA products are aimed at qualified investors (professional investors), who must have proof of assets of several million Hong Kong dollars and must pass strict KYC (know your customer) and AML (anti-money laundering) audits. You, an ordinary retail investor in the mainland, can't even open an account, let alone buy it. Those who shout "Everyone can invest in RWA" on WeChat groups and Douyin are not compliant products at all. Most of them are air coins or Ponzi schemes, which are specifically targeting your wallet.
Truth 3: All those who tell you "you can make money by investing in RWA tokens" are sickles ready to cut you
The most disgusting thing about the RWA circle in the mainland is that there are "air coins" and "Ponzi schemes" everywhere. The most magical thing now is: a group of people who can't even tell ABS and REITs apart are starting to teach people how to play RWA. Their rhetoric is surprisingly consistent: "The liquidity of traditional assets explodes after being put on the chain", "RWA tokens can be traded globally 24 hours a day", "Holding means enjoying asset appreciation"... Does it sound familiar? This is exactly the same as the slogan "Blockchain subverts everything" during the ICO (initial coin offering) back then. These projects, under the banner of RWA, tell you that you can wait for a hundredfold return by investing a few thousand yuan in their "RWA tokens". Brother, auntie, how can it be so good? These so-called RWA tokens have no underlying asset support at all, and even the white paper is copied, which is pure empty-handed tricks.
What's even more outrageous is that some projects also engage in multi-level distribution and recruit people for commissions, which is no different from pyramid schemes. You invest money, and you may see that the "return" is quite high in the short term, but that is just the leeks in front feeding the leeks behind. Once the capital plate collapses, your principal will not even bubble up. Don't believe those nonsense that "RWA is the future of blockchain" and "Missing RWA means missing wealth". The real RWA is a serious financial product, not a casino for you to gamble your life.
Truth 4: Enterprises doing RWA should find securities companies, lawyers, and accountants, not "middlemen"
Enterprises that want to do RWA must also keep their eyes open. There is a strange phenomenon in the RWA circle now: a group of middlemen who call themselves "RWA full-case service providers" are more active than securities firms, accountants, and lawyers combined. Now there are many "RWA full-case service providers" and "teaching teachers" emerging in the mainland, boasting that they can help you put your assets on the chain, issue tokens, and sell them globally. Haha, most of these people are middlemen, and their work is nothing more than pimping to earn your consulting fees.
To do RWA seriously is similar to doing ABS (asset-backed securities) or REITs (real estate investment trusts). You have to find a professional iron triangle composed of securities firms, lawyers, and accountants. They will help you design the transaction structure, run regulatory approvals, do due diligence and valuation. What can middlemen do? They don't even understand the compliance process. At most, they can draw a big pie for you and charge you a "service fee". If an enterprise wants to do RWA, don't be fooled by these "teaching teachers". Finding a reliable financial institution is the right way.
Truth 5: Not everything can be RWA. Assets that cannot be sold off-chain are useless even if they are put on-chain
There is a classic saying in the RWA circle: "Traditional assets have poor liquidity? Put them on-chain! Global transactions after being put on-chain!" It seems that any asset can become a hot commodity if it is thrown on the blockchain. Brother, be realistic! Assets that cannot be sold off-chain, how can they be sold on-chain? The essence of RWA is asset securitization, and the core is the quality and income model of the underlying assets. If your assets are a mess, such as a pile of inventory that no one wants or an office building that cannot be rented out, no one will buy them even if they are put on-chain. Poor asset liquidity is essentially poor asset quality, and has nothing to do with whether it is on-chain or not.
Hong Kong investors are not fools, they are smart money, and they invest in RWA based on cash flow, risk exposure, and exit mechanism. Your "20% annualized" profit model is nonsense. RWA is not magic. The logic of assets on and off the chain has not changed. Those who advocate "everything can be RWA" just want you to spend money on trial and error so that they can profit from it.
Truth 6: It is not necessary to set up a subject in Hainan. Data compliance is not that mysterious
There is also a "metaphysical" operation in the mainland RWA circle: Many project parties say that if they want to do RWA, they must set up a subject in Hainan to get data outbound compliance. Please, how can it be so exaggerated? Data outbound compliance is indeed required, but the "Measures for Data Outbound Security Assessment" and other national-level regulations have long established the process. Not all data outbound approval is required. Only cross-border transmission of sensitive data requires filing or security assessment. The compliance requirements for data outbound depend on many factors such as the specific data type and outbound scenario. Not all situations require going to Hainan.
What's more, Hainan's special policy is mainly aimed at offshore business in the free trade port, not the only way out for RWA. The core of an enterprise doing RWA is to run through the compliance process, such as finding a lawyer to sort out data compliance plans and communicate with regulators for filing. Don't listen to those who say "you must go to Hainan" and "Hainan is an RWA paradise". The path to compliance has always been transparent. Why do you need so many twists and turns?
Truth 7: There is basically no secondary market for RWA products in Hong Kong. Global trading? Overthinking!
There is also a common "myth" in the RWA circle: RWA tokens can be traded globally and have invincible liquidity. What is the truth? The Hong Kong SFC is extremely cautious about secondary trading. Currently, only very limited inter-institutional transactions have been opened for RWA products issued in Hong Kong. Ant Chain's charging pile RWA and Patrol Eagle Group's battery swap cabinet RWA are essentially private placement products, and retail investors can't even touch the trading interface. Why? Because RWA is essentially a securitized asset, it is subject to strict financial supervision and transactions must comply with securities laws and exchange rules.
Do you think that if you buy an RWA token, you can trade it 24 hours a day around the world like Bitcoin? You think too much! The trading objects of Hong Kong's RWA products are usually institutional investors or qualified investors, and retail investors can't get involved at all. Those projects that boast "RWA global circulation" mostly use "blockchain" as a gimmick, but in fact it is just a closed pool of funds. Liquidity? It doesn't exist.
Truth 8: The RWA track is not the wealth code for ordinary people, don't be fooled by anxious marketing
The most annoying thing about the RWA circle is the full screen of anxious marketing. What "RWA is the future of blockchain", "Missing RWA means missing wealth", "Ordinary people can also rely on RWA to turn over", it's really disgusting to hear too much. Brother, RWA is a serious financial track, playing with the combination of asset securitization and blockchain technology, what does it have to do with the opportunity for ordinary people to make money?
The ones who can really make money from the RWA track are either professional financial institutions or players who understand asset operations. Ordinary retail investors? At most, they can buy some compliant RWA products and get a fixed income, which is no different from buying bonds. Those who advocate that "RWA can make you rich overnight" just want you to pay for their "courses" or "tokens". Don't be kidnapped by anxiety, RWA is not your life-saving straw.
Truth 9: Compliance and supervision are the soul of RWA, and RWA without compliance is a blank check
The greatest value of RWA lies in compliance and supervision. Without these two, what is the difference between RWA and air coins? Compliant RWA products must have clear underlying assets, transparent transaction structures, and must be subject to review by financial regulators. The reason why Hong Kong's RWA is reliable is that it is strictly regulated by the SFC (Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission), and the rights and interests of investors are guaranteed.
On the other hand, how many of the "RWA projects" in the mainland are truly compliant? Most of them don't even have a white paper. Where are the assets and how do they get the income? It all depends on a mouth. If you invest money and the project party runs away, who can you cry to? The soul of RWA is compliance and supervision. "RWA" without these two is an empty check without any guarantee.
Truth 10: The issuance cost of RWA is not low, and may be higher than traditional financing
The last point is that many people think that RWA is a "low-cost financing artifact", but it is not the case at all. RWA issuance involves asset evaluation, legal due diligence, transaction structure design, blockchain development, and regulatory approval. Which step does not cost money? All in all, the issuance cost of RWA may be higher than traditional loans and equity financing.
Especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, if they want to issue RWA, they still have to face high initial investment, such as legal fees, audit fees, and technology development fees. Hong Kong's RWA projects cost millions of Hong Kong dollars, and few mainland enterprises can afford it. So, don't listen to those nonsense that "RWA is the savior of small and medium-sized enterprises". The financing method depends on the company's own situation. RWA is not a panacea.
Conclusion: Sober up, RWA is not your life-saving straw
Writing this article is not to deny the value of RWA-asset tokenization is indeed a future trend. It makes asset securitization more efficient and transparent, and it is indeed a direction for the combination of blockchain and finance. But the problem is: this circle is too impetuous, too eager for quick success, and too much for leeks. The air coins that cut leeks, the marketing accounts that sell anxiety, and the middlemen who ask for sky-high prices have made a serious financial track a mess.
Ordinary people who want to participate in RWA can at most buy some compliant RWA products and get a steady income, but don't expect to get rich overnight. Enterprises that want to do RWA should find professional institutions and go through compliance procedures, and don't be cheated by "full-case service providers". RWA is not a myth, nor is it a casino. Recognize these 10 truths and don't let your wallet become someone else's leeks.
If you still want to jump into the fire pit of RWA after reading this article, please tell me your wallet key before you jump, and I will keep it for you.
Joy
Catherine
Kikyo
Weatherly
Anais