Bitcoin Protocol Upgrades Should Avoid Forced Legislation, Says F2Pool Co-Founder

F2Pool co-founder Wang Chun expressed on the X platform that Bitcoin protocol upgrades should not adopt methods similar to U.S. politicians who use 'bundled bills' to force through necessary but unpopular clauses. According to Odaily, this is a key reason for his opposition to BIP-110 and BIP-54. In response to whether any issues were encountered using BIP-54 for fixes, Wang Chun added that the 'Timewarp' issue has been longstanding and offers no significant advantage to miners, as predicting the next block miner is impossible. Its primary use is to disrupt certain altcoins, and since it offers little benefit to Bitcoin miners, there is no urgent need for modification. Additionally, block verification efficiency has significantly improved due to libsecp256k1 and hardware upgrades, negating the need for protocol layer adjustments. The 'forged confirmed transactions' issue fundamentally relies on breaking double SHA256 collisions, which would imply a breach of Bitcoin's core security if successful. Wang Chun further stated that these issues are insufficient to drive protocol modifications, with only the 'duplicate transactions' problem having some repair value, possibly being one of the few changes worth implementing.