PoW vs PoS: Comparison of the economic costs of attacks
This article compares the economic cost of attacking a PoW (Proof of Work) network and attacking a PoS (Proof of Stake) network.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44bc8/44bc8c954d122d459537e64d05f98c0b68904209" alt="image JinseFinance"
This article compares the economic cost of attacking a PoW (Proof of Work) network and attacking a PoS (Proof of Stake) network.
From the perspective of protocol design, it is necessary not only to design a market mechanism for redistributing MEV, but also to consider how to make validators more decentralized and how to improve censorship resistance.
In our crypto circle, although there are various innovations in technology and application scenarios, for those of us who are old hands, the innovation that has the greatest impact is the innovation in the way assets are issued.
We explain the different approaches the two take. Finally, we break down Sanctum, a novel protocol that rethinks liquidity staking on Solana.
Ethereum's Vitalik Buterin defends PoS transition: addresses centralization concerns, energy consumption reduction, and environmental impact.
Ethereum PoW has revealed plans for its mainnet. It has also released information on preparing full nodes.
The Chainlink protocol will continue operations on Ethereum after the upcoming Merge to the proof-of-stake consensus layer.
New York City Mayor Eric Adams, long a supporter of the crypto industry, has now pledged support for sustainable bitcoin miners, asking Governor Hochul to veto a two-year mining ban.
European Central Bank researchers anticipate a clash between the green transition policies and Bitcoin investors.