The saying goes, “The apple does not fall from the tree,” seem to apply to the trio of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) and his parents. SBF has been in the news ever since the collapse of FTX last year and recently for his bail revocation and jail sentence, as well as charges for fraudulent campaign donations exceeding $100 million. Now the spotlight has turned to his parents.
Just yesterday, attorney John Deaton has ignited a thought-provoking discourse on a digital platform regarding the intricate interplay between SBF’s parents and the dramatic implosion of FTX late last year. His observations have cast a glaring spotlight on a series of financial transactions involving the fallen founder's parents, arousing concerns over their potential implication in the alleged malfeasance.
An intriguing narrative unfolds as John outlined a sequence of events where SBF's parents garnered financial benefits from the cryptocurrency exchange prior to its eventual bankruptcy — a revelation that prompts deeper reflection on their roles in this unfolding saga.
An illuminating thread within this narrative pertains to a transaction involving $10 million, detailed by John. Evidently, this substantial sum found its way into an FTX account bearing SBF's name, only to be subsequently bestowed upon his father, Joseph Bankman.
Prior to John’s post, X user Sunil had posted about Joseph’s involvement as well.
In a strategic financial move that transpired during the year 2021, a pivotal juncture was seized utilising a lifetime estate and gift tax exemption. This carefully orchestrated move paved the way for an entire sum to be conveyed with minimal tax implications. Behind this transaction lies a curious backdrop: the funds for this sizable gift are said to have emanated from a loan originating from none other than Alameda Research, the sibling entity of FTX.
The layers of this narrative lead to an intersection where Joseph becomes inextricably interwoven into the web of FTX's operations. Notably, his role as a Corporations and Tax Law professor at Stanford Law School is cast into sharp focus. Allegations allude to his involvement in the establishment of shell companies — an implication that raises pressing questions about their purposes and motivations. Were these entities mere conduits for fraudulent activities, or do they encapsulate a more complex array of functions within the broader landscape of FTX?
More Questions Drawn Into the Equation
Furthermore, attorney John has accentuated the political entanglements enveloping the Bankman-Fried family, casting a spotlight on the intricate webs of influence and association. Joseph’s past support for Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren stands as a compelling facet of this narrative — a dimension that prompts contemplation about the dynamics at the intersection of finance and politics. Adding to the intrigue is the role played by Barbara Fried, SBF’s mother, who operates a political action committee (PAC) aligned with the Democratic Party.
John raised another dimension of inquiry: the intriguing proximity between SBF and Gary Gensler, the current chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), who has a long-standing affiliation with the Democratic Party. The attorney's pointed questions addressed whether the substantial financial contributions made by SBF exerted any sway over the nature of his interactions with the SEC chair.
Moreover, John highlighted a fascinating aspect — the ownership of real estate in the Bahamas by the parents of the FTX founder. What adds intrigue to this scenario is the revelation that the funds utilised for these real estate acquisitions originated from the coffers of the defunct crypto exchange.
As the ongoing investigation into the demise of FTX unfolds, these recent disclosures add a layer of intrigue to the narrative, one that seemingly implicates the parents of SBF in the unfolding saga. Amidst the labyrinthine network of financial transactions, woven together with political affiliations, a veil of uncertainty hovers over the extent of SBF's parents' involvement in the alleged misconduct.