Major institutions holding Bitcoin may lose patience with developers for not addressing quantum computing issues swiftly, according to venture capitalist Nic Carter. According to Cointelegraph, Carter expressed concerns during the Bits and Bips podcast, suggesting that these institutions might replace current developers if progress is not made. He emphasized that developers seem inactive on this front, which could lead to significant changes in the Bitcoin development landscape.
Carter highlighted the potential for a "corporate takeover" if Bitcoin developers fail to implement quantum-resistant cryptography promptly. He pointed out that BlackRock, the largest asset manager globally, holds approximately 761,801 Bitcoin, valued at around $50.15 billion, representing about 3.62% of Bitcoin's total supply. This substantial investment could drive institutions to demand action, fearing the security risks posed by quantum computing.
Austin Campbell, founder of Zero Knowledge Consulting, echoed Carter's concerns, stating that if structural problems persist, institutions might be compelled to intervene. Carter has been vocal about the quantum computing threat, attributing Bitcoin's price underperformance to this issue, which he believes is the most critical story of the year.
Despite these warnings, not everyone agrees with the notion of institutional influence over Bitcoin's network. Ram Ahluwahlia, founder of Lumida Wealth Management, argued that major institutions are passive investors and unlikely to act as activists. The industry remains divided on the urgency of addressing quantum computing risks.
Charles Edwards, founder of Capriole Investments, views quantum computing as a potential existential threat to Bitcoin, advocating for immediate upgrades to enhance network security. Conversely, Christopher Bendiksen, CoinShares Bitcoin research lead, noted that only a small fraction of Bitcoin is vulnerable to quantum attacks, suggesting the threat may not be as imminent as some fear.
Prominent figures like Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Strategy, and Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, believe that quantum threats are exaggerated and unlikely to impact the network for decades. The debate continues as the industry assesses the potential risks and necessary actions to safeguard Bitcoin's future.