According to PANews, the Federal Reserve's monetary policy is under unprecedented scrutiny as the global economic landscape evolves. Despite policy rates reaching historic highs, the U.S. economy continues to exhibit robust growth, challenging traditional economic theories. The persistent strength of the job market and steady economic expansion raise questions about why tight monetary policy has not effectively curbed economic overheating as expected.
Recent research suggests that this phenomenon is not a paradox but rather highlights the limitations of conventional analytical frameworks. By reevaluating the impact of financial conditions on the economy, a deeper understanding of the actual transmission mechanisms of monetary policy can be achieved.
The Federal Reserve has raised interest rates to historic levels, yet the economy remains on an upward trajectory, as evidenced by strong employment reports. This situation may arise from focusing on the wrong indicators. Although policy rates are high, financial conditions are relatively loose. Rising stock markets and narrowing credit spreads have effectively offset much of the Fed's tightening measures.
Data from the Fed's own FCI-G index, a composite financial variable measuring its impact on economic growth, supports this view. While long-term rates have risen and the dollar has strengthened, positive market performance, primarily driven by stock market booms and improved credit spreads, is stimulating economic growth.
The combination of tight monetary policy and strong growth is not a paradox. Research conducted with Ricardo Caballero and TCaravello indicates that broader financial conditions, rather than policy rates alone, are crucial for the economy. The analysis reveals that when financial conditions are loose, even if driven by volatile asset demand (sentiment), they can boost output and inflation, ultimately forcing interest rates to rise. This aligns with current observations.
Quantitatively, the study finds that financial conditions account for up to 55% of economic output fluctuations. Moreover, the primary transmission mechanism of monetary policy should be through influencing financial conditions rather than directly through interest rates.
The current scenario aligns with this framework: despite high interest rates, loose financial conditions are supporting strong growth and may prevent inflation from returning to target levels. Looking ahead, this suggests that the Fed's task is not yet complete. Achieving the 2% target may require tightening financial conditions, potentially through market adjustments, a stronger dollar, or further rate hikes.
The path of interest rates will largely depend on market dynamics. If markets adjust and the dollar strengthens, current rate levels may suffice. However, if financial conditions remain loose, further rate hikes may be necessary. This framework suggests that Fed observers should focus less on the "terminal rate" debate and more on the evolution of financial conditions, where true monetary policy transmission occurs. While the research proposes a specific FCI target, the more critical takeaway is the need to change how monetary policy is conceptualized and discussed. Policy rates are merely an input; financial conditions are what truly matter.